24 February 2010

Schools are churning out the unemployable

An informative article on employment and education issues in the UK. Unfortunately, its tone is rather negative.
In reply, I would say that there will always be faults in the educational and political system. Our task should be to focus on the positive and constructive trends, which certainly DO exist, and to build on these.
(Highlighting is mine.)


Times Online


From

February 21, 2010

Schools are churning out the unemployable

 

The latest unemployment figures are a shocker. Eight million adults are “economically inactive”. That means one in five people of working age does not have a job. A new and expanding group, poignantly described as “discouraged” workers, have even given up looking.
 

They are right to be discouraged but wrong that there is no work. A report out on Friday points out that a fifth of firms and a quarter of employers in the state sector are still hiring — despite the recession. Except they are taking on migrant workers — not our home-grown “discouraged” variety. 

The managing director of a medium-sized IT company explained why. High-flyers — Oxford and Cambridge graduates — are still as good as any in the world. His problems come when he tries to recruit middle management. Last year he interviewed 52 graduates — all educated in state schools. On paper they looked “brilliant students”. Each had three As at A-level and a 2:1 degree. He shook his head. “There’s a big difference between people passing exams and being ready for work.” 

This was obvious even before the interview began. Of the 52 applicants, half arrived late. Only three of the 52 walked up to the managing director, looked him in the eye, shook his hand and said, “Good morning.” The rest “just ambled in”. When he asked them to solve a problem, only 12 had come equipped with a notebook and pencil.

The three who had greeted him proved the strongest candidates and he hired them. Within a year they were out because of their “lackadaisical” attitude. They did not turn up on time; for the first six months a manager had to check all their emails for spelling and grammar; they did not know how to learn. It was the first time they had ever been asked to learn on their own. Their ability to “engage in business” was “incredibly” disappointing and “at 5.30 on the dot they left the office”. 

This year the managing director has joined the 20% of companies recruiting overseas. “We are an English company but we have no English staff. It’s just too much trouble,” he said. 

It is the same story with employers at every level in the UK. Sir Terry Leahy, the chief executive of Tesco, put it bluntly. Too many children have been leaving school after 11 or 13 years of compulsory education “without the basic skills to get on in life and hold down a job”. He said 5m adults were functionally illiterate and 17m could not add up properly. “On-the-job training” cannot act as a “bandage or sticking plaster” for “the failure of our education system”. 

A CBI survey revealed that literacy and numeracy were not the only problems. More than 50% of employers complained that young people were inarticulate, unable to communicate concisely, interpret written instructions or perform simple mental calculations. 

This goes a long way to explain why, of the 1.7m jobs created since 1997, 81% have gone to foreign workers. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) agrees with Leahy. UK citizens are on the dole because of “issues around basic employability skills, incentives and motivation”. It is a pity it has not passed that insight on to the Department for Children, Schools and Families. 

The DWP has made it clear: work is where the inflated claims for our state education finally hit the buffers. At every stage we have a system in which the expediency of politicians and the ideology of the educational establishment take precedence over the interests of pupils. ...

Read the full article here.

2 comments:

Saman said...

That is amazing. The last sentence highlights a strong point, which is practiced in several fields. In the field of development, in some cases, projects and aid efforts are based and developed around long cherished ideals and ideologies and as a result their influence is limited in its outreach. As opposed to developing strategies according to the needs identified by the people themselves, they are passive recipients of packages developed by others. As ‘students’ we then become accustomed to having somebody else do things for us.

Regarding the current approach to curriculum development and delivery, students tend to become accustomed to passive learning, which does not allow their full-potentials to be developed.

When we view education in the light of capacity building and empowerment the mode of delivery takes on new meaning. Although we are learning a lot about the term 'capacity building' and what exactly it entails, we are seeing positive glimpses of it through the study of the Institute Process. Not only are participants (not students) gaining knowledge (which is only element of capacity, which is mistakenly taken as the only form in some educational institutions), but they are equipped with skills for service, along with developing positive habits, attitudes and qualities. The way they develop capacity is through the notion of accompaniment, which involves walking together on a path of service, not having a teacher or boss ‘tell’ you what you should be doing. This holds deep implications for the field of education, since it is proving to be an effective means to 'empower' individuals.

In a typical classroom we see one teacher and many students who are the recipients of knowledge bestowed on them by the knowledgeable one. The main capacity one develops in this approach is to sit and listen and take in information. No wonder it is so difficult to become an active agent when ones leaves University, since this is what we have become used to.

The Institute Process is giving us a whole new insight into educational material development and delivery. In our cluster, we are seeing first hand accounts of participants building capacity for service by engaging in an active mode of learning. As they learn, they put into practice their knowledge, which actually develops the capacity even more! We have a lot to gain from going through the institute process :) The tutor is not telling them what to do, or giving them instructions, but learning together as they develop skills together.

Alex B said...

Thank you for your enlightening and thoughtful comment on the article, Simon! The distinction you make between an active and passive approach to the knowledge one is introduced to in the educational system would certainly seem significant for its usefulness to the student in real-life.